Q&A – 19 July 2021
Compulsory HIV testing for pregnant women
I am told a pregnant woman must undergo compulsory HIV testing when attending a heath care facility. Is this not contrary to the right to privacy which is a basic human right in our Constitution? Does the law really allow someone to be subjected to HIV test without his/her consent?
There are two laws that govern HIV testing which are the HIV and AIDS (Prevention and Control) Act, 2008 as amended by the Written Laws (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act No 14 of 2019 and the HIV and AIDS (counselling and testing, use of ARVs and Disclosure) Regulations, 2011. As a general rule section 15(3) of the Act prohibits compelling or procuring HIV testing of another without his or her consent.
If there are pregnant women who are subjected to a compulsory HIV testing, we think it is done so on misconception of section 15(5) of the Act which provides that “every pregnant woman and the man responsible for pregnancy or a spouse and every person attending a health care facility shall be counselled and offered voluntary HIV testing”. It is compulsory for a health care officer to counsel a pregnant woman or patient attending a health care facility to take voluntary HIV test with her or his spouse or partner. The law does not make it compulsory to subject a pregnant woman or any patient attending a health care facility to undergo HIV test.
It is an offence under section 15(7) of the Act to compel a person to undergo HIV testing or procure HIV testing of another without his or her knowledge. However, a person may be subjected to a compulsory HIV testing only where:
- There is an order of the Court that a person named in the order be subjected to the HIV test;
- The person to be tested is a donor of human organs and tissues;
- The one to be tested is accused of a sexual offence;
- The person to be tested is unconscious and unable to give consent;
- In emergency situations where due to medical or psychiatric condition of the client it is impossible to obtain consent of the client, the medical practitioner attending the client may proceed with HIV test without client’s consent;
- Medical or health practitioner believes that HIV test is clinically necessary or desirable in the interest of the person to be tested;
- Medical or health or occupational health officer has been exposed to blood or other body fluid of another person and that other person refuses to take voluntary test to determine whether he is infected or not. In such a situation, if blood sample of the person is available, his blood may be tested but he has no available blood sample, the person exposed to the danger may petition the Court for an order to subject the person to a compulsory HIV test.
Excessive sound from halls in residential areas
My neighbour has an entertainment hall in our residential street. Over the weekends the hall emits loud music that seriously disturbs us at night to the extent that we hardly get sleep. When we urge him to reduce the sound, he is telling us that the hall is licenced to operate as entertainment hall. What can we do to stop this disturbance?
Excessive sound is one of the environmental pollutions recognised under the Environmental Management Act, 2004. The Environmental Management (Standards for Control of Noise and Vibration Pollution) Regulations, 2015 prescribes the maximum permissible noise level for places of entertainments located within residential areas. During day time which starts from 6.00 am to 10.00 pm the permissible level of noise is 60 decibels whereas during night time which is from 10.00pm to 6.00am the permissible level of noise is 40 decibels. Emission of sound beyond these prescribed levels requires a permit from the National Environmental Management Council.
A person who emits or causes emission of sound beyond the authorised level for more than two minutes without a permit from NEMC which sound disturbs, annoys or endangers the comfort of others commits an offence. The offence of causing emission or emitting sound pollution attracts a fine of not less than TZS 2M but not exceeding TZS 10M. The law also provides an option of imprisonment. A person aggrieved with the sound pollution may complain to NEMC or environmental inspector or environmental officer in order to issue a compliance order or stop order or improvement notice or complain to the police in order to arrest the offender and charge him.
Mobile money account conmen
Last week someone phoned me pretending to be a teacher. He told me that my child fell sick at school and money was needed urgently to hire a car to take her to the hospital. I immediately transferred credit from my mobile money account to his account. After few hours I found out that my child was well. Does the law protect us against these conmen?
Cheating someone and causing him to debit his mobile money account and credit the account of the offender or a third party is an offence called obtaining credit by false pretence contrary to section 305(a) of the Penal Code [Cap.16 R.E 2019]. This offence being a fraud, the offender can also be charged with money laundering of the proceeds of credit received in offender’s or third party’s mobile money account. The law hence provides you full protection of this type of fraud which is prevalent nowadays.